Descripción del título
Adaptación española de la E...
Objetivo: Analizar la validez y la fiabilidad de la adaptación de la escala Perceived Personal Control (PPC) en el contexto español para pacientes portadoras de mutación en los genes BRCA1/2 responsables del cáncer de mama y ovario hereditario (CMOH). Método: Adaptación transcultural y validación de la escala Perceived Personal Control (PPC) desarrollada por Shiloh y colaboraradores mediante traducción, retrotraducción y validación a través de un análisis factorial exploratorio con rotación Oblimin en una muestra de 176 mujeres portadoras de genes BRCA 1/2 para CMOH. Resultados: La versión española de la PPC reduce a seis los nueve ítems de la escala original, dado que esta estructura es la que ofrece una solución factorial más satisfactoria. El análisis factorial mostró un solo factor que explica el 51,07% de la varianza, en el que todos los ítems tenían cargas factoriales por encima de 0,4. El coeficiente (Sa(B de Cronbach fue de 0,84 para el conjunto de la escala, la cual permite obtener valores que oscilan entre 0 (bajo grado de percepción de control) y 2 (alto grado de percepción de control). Conclusiones: La adaptación española de la Escala de Percepción de Control (PPC6) posee propiedades psicométricas satisfactorias en la versión de 6 ítems con un solo factor, por lo que su utilización en contexto español Consejo Genético para cáncer hereditario parece adecuada
Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the reliability and validity of the spanish adaptation of the Perceived Personal Control (PPC) scale in women who were positive for BRCA1/2 genes, which are related with hereditary ovarian and breast cancer (HOBC). Method: PPC original items developed by Shiloh and co-workers were translated and back-translated in order to develop an spanish version which was analyzed by an exploratory factor analysis with Oblimin rotation. Answers to the spanish version were provided by a sample of 176 women who were positive for BRCA1/2 for HOBC. Results: Spanish version contains only six items of the nine original items, since this structure provided the optimal solution to the exploratory factor analysis. This version is a one-factor scale (51.07% of variance explained) and all items had factor loading values >0.4. The scale has good reliability (Cronbach's Alpha =0.84) and gives a range of values between 0 (low perceived control) and 2 (high perceived control). Conclusions: Spanish adaptation (PPC6) of the original 9-items version has enough reliability and psychometric properties, and it seems to be useful to be applied in Genetic Counseling at spanish cultural settings
Analítica
analitica Rebiun28806735 https://catalogo.rebiun.org/rebiun/record/Rebiun28806735 210922s2018 xx o 000 0 spa d https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/PSIC/article/view/59172 10.5209/PSIC.59172 S9M S9M dc Adaptación española de la Escala de Control Personal Percibido ("Perceived Personal Control") en Consejo Genético electronic resource] Spanish adaptation of the Perceived Personal Control (PPC) in genetic counseling Asociación de Psicooncología de Madrid 2018-03-23 Asociación de Psicooncología de Madrid application/pdf Open access content. Open access content star Objetivo: Analizar la validez y la fiabilidad de la adaptación de la escala Perceived Personal Control (PPC) en el contexto español para pacientes portadoras de mutación en los genes BRCA1/2 responsables del cáncer de mama y ovario hereditario (CMOH). Método: Adaptación transcultural y validación de la escala Perceived Personal Control (PPC) desarrollada por Shiloh y colaboraradores mediante traducción, retrotraducción y validación a través de un análisis factorial exploratorio con rotación Oblimin en una muestra de 176 mujeres portadoras de genes BRCA 1/2 para CMOH. Resultados: La versión española de la PPC reduce a seis los nueve ítems de la escala original, dado que esta estructura es la que ofrece una solución factorial más satisfactoria. El análisis factorial mostró un solo factor que explica el 51,07% de la varianza, en el que todos los ítems tenían cargas factoriales por encima de 0,4. El coeficiente (Sa(B de Cronbach fue de 0,84 para el conjunto de la escala, la cual permite obtener valores que oscilan entre 0 (bajo grado de percepción de control) y 2 (alto grado de percepción de control). Conclusiones: La adaptación española de la Escala de Percepción de Control (PPC6) posee propiedades psicométricas satisfactorias en la versión de 6 ítems con un solo factor, por lo que su utilización en contexto español Consejo Genético para cáncer hereditario parece adecuada Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the reliability and validity of the spanish adaptation of the Perceived Personal Control (PPC) scale in women who were positive for BRCA1/2 genes, which are related with hereditary ovarian and breast cancer (HOBC). Method: PPC original items developed by Shiloh and co-workers were translated and back-translated in order to develop an spanish version which was analyzed by an exploratory factor analysis with Oblimin rotation. Answers to the spanish version were provided by a sample of 176 women who were positive for BRCA1/2 for HOBC. Results: Spanish version contains only six items of the nine original items, since this structure provided the optimal solution to the exploratory factor analysis. This version is a one-factor scale (51.07% of variance explained) and all items had factor loading values >0.4. The scale has good reliability (Cronbach's Alpha =0.84) and gives a range of values between 0 (low perceived control) and 2 (high perceived control). Conclusions: Spanish adaptation (PPC6) of the original 9-items version has enough reliability and psychometric properties, and it seems to be useful to be applied in Genetic Counseling at spanish cultural settings Spanish Genetic counseling; hereditary cancer; perceived control; breast cancer; ovarian cancer Consejo genético; cáncer hereditario; percepción de control; cáncer de mama; cáncer de ovario info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares González-Concepción, Melinda. cre Castejón, Vanesa. cre Blanco, Ignacio. cre Blasco, Tomás. cre Psicooncología; Vol 15 No 1 (2018); 23-36 Psicooncología; Vol 15 No 1 (2018); 23-36 Psicooncología; Vol 15 No 1 (2018); 23-36 Psicooncología; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2018); 23-36 1988-8287 1696-7240 https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/PSIC/article/view/59172/4564456546582 /*ref*/Llort G, Serrano RMR, Sanchez AB, Teule A. SEOM clinical guidelines in Hereditary Breast and ovarian cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2015;17:956-61. doi: 10.1007/s12094-015-1435-3 /*ref*/Peshkin BN, Lerman C. Genetic counselling for hereditary breast cancer. Lancet 1999;353:2176-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2015.10.001 /*ref*/Nelson HD, Fu R, Goddard K, Mitchell JP, Okinaka-Hu L, Pappas M, et al. Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer: Systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. 2013;(101). doi: 10.7326/M13-1684 /*ref*/Den Heijer M, Seynaeve C, Vanheusden K, Timman R, Duivenvoorden HJ, Tilanus-Linthorst M, et al. Long-term psychological distress in women at risk for hereditary breast cancer adhering to regular surveillance: A risk profile. Psychooncology 2013;22:598-604. doi: 10.1002/pon.3039 /*ref*/Ringwald J, Wochnowski C, Bosse K, Giel KE, Schäffeler N, Zipfel S, et al. Psychological distress, anxiety, and depression of cancer-affected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: a systematic review. J Genet Couns 2016; 25: 880-91 doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9949-66 /*ref*/González M, Blanco I, Bayes R. Dificultad en la comunicación del riesgo de padecer cáncer hereditario. Psicooncología 2005; 2: 285-92. [Acceso el 15 de enero de 2018] Disponible en: http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/44545 /*ref*/González M, Blanco I, Blasco T. Efectos de la primera visita de consejo genético sobre la percepción de riesgo y el malestar emocional. 2011; 8: 441-51. doi: 10.5209/revPSIC.2011.v8.n2-3.37891 /*ref*/Cardenal C, Cruzado JA. Estrategias de afrontamiento y malestar emocional en cribado.Psicooncología 2014; 11: 285-99. doi: 10.5209/revPSIC.2014.v11.n2-3.47389 /*ref*/Castejónn V, Rovira T, Sumalla EC, Darder E, Iglesias S, Ochoa C, et al. Adaptación cultural y validación de la versión española de la Escala de Autoconcepto en BRCA en mujeres portadoras con alto riesgo de cáncer de mama y ovario hereditario. Med Clin (Barc) 2016;146:148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2015.09.018 /*ref*/Pieterse AH, Ausems MGEM, Spreeuwenberg P, van Dulmen S. Longer-term influence of breast cancer genetic counseling on cognitions and distress: Smaller benefits for affected versus unaffected women. Patient Educ Couns 2011;85:425-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.017 /*ref*/Cruzado J, Perez P, Olivera H. Consecuencias y necesidades de la intervencion psicológica en consejo genético para mujeres en riesgo de cáncer de mama hereditario. Psicooncología 2007;4:465-82 /*ref*/Vos J, Oosterwijk JC, Gomez-Garcia E, Menko FH, Collee MJ, van Asperen CJ, et al. Exploring the short-term impact of DNA-testing in breast cancer patients: the counselees' perception matters, but the actual BRCA1/2 result does not. Patient Educ Couns 2012;86:239-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.017 /*ref*/Bárez M, Blasco T, Fernández-Castro J, Viladrich C. Perceived control and psychological distress in women with breast cancer: A longitudinal study. J Behav Med 2009;32:187-96. doi: 10.1007/s10865-008-9180-5 /*ref*/Hudson JL, Bundy C, Coventry PA, Dickens C. Exploring the relationship between cognitive illness representations and poor emotional health and their combined association with diabetes self-care. A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res 2014;76:265-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.02.004 /*ref*/Bratzke LC, Muehrer RJ, Kehl KA, Lee KS, Ward EC, Kwekkeboom KL. Self-management priority setting and decision-making in adults with multimorbidity: A narrative review of literature. Int J Nurs Stud 2015; 52: 744-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.10.010 /*ref*/Shiloh S, Berkenstadt M, Meiran N, BatMiriamKatznelson M, Goldman B. Mediating effects of perceived personal control in coping with a health threat: The case of genetic counseling. J Appl Soc Psychol 1997; 27: 1146-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01799.x /*ref*/Davey A, Rostant K, Harrop K, Goldblatt J, O'Leary P. Evaluating genetic counseling: Client expectations, psychological adjustment and satisfaction with service. J Genet Couns 2005;14:197-206. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-0519-6 /*ref*/Robinson CL, Jouni H, Kruisselbrink TM, Austin EE, Christensen KD, Green RC, et al. Disclosing genetic risk for coronary heart disease: effects on perceived personal control and genetic counseling satisfaction. Clin Genet 2016; 89: 251-7. doi: 10.1111/cge.12577 /*ref*/Smets EMA, Pieterse AH, Aalfs CM, Ausems MGEM, Dulmen AM Van. The Perceived Personal Control (PPC) Questionnaire as an outcome of genetic counseling: Reliability and validity of the instrument. Am J Med Genet A 2006; 40:843-50. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31185 /*ref*/McAllister M, Wood AM, Dunn G, Shiloh S, Todd C. The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire: reliability and validity in a sample from the United Kingdom. Am J Med Genet A 2012; 158:367-72. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34374 /*ref*/Berkenstadt M, Shiloh S, Barkai G, Katznelson MBM, Goldman B. Perceived personal control (PPC): A new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet A 1999;82:53-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990101)82:1<53::AID-AJMG11>3.0.CO;2-# /*ref*/Cha ES, Kim KH, Erlen JA. Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: Issues and techniques. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58:386-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x /*ref*/Chen HY, Boore JRP. Translation and back-translation in qualitative nursing research: Methodological review. J Clin Nurs 2010;19:234-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02896.x. /*ref*/Beranuy M, Chamarro A, Graner C, Carbonell X. Validación de dos escalas breves para evaluar la adicción a Internet y el abuso de móvil. Psicothema 2009;21:480-5 /*ref*/Averill JR. This Week ' s Citation Classic. 1983;1983 /*ref*/Aalfs CM, Oort FJ, de Haes JCJM, Leschot NJ, Smets EM a. A comparison of counselee and counselor satisfaction in reproductive genetic counseling. Clin Genet 2007;72:74-82. doi. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00834.x /*ref*/Brédart A, Kop JL, Depauw A, Caron O, Sultan S, Leblond D, et al. Short-term psychological impact of the BRCA1/2 test result in women with breast cancer according to their perceived probability of genetic predisposition to cancer. Br J Cancer 2013;108:1012-20. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.599 /*ref*/Bárez M, Blasco T, Fernandez-Castro J, Viladrich C. Need for cognition and psychosocial adjustment in prostate cancer patients and partners. J Psychosoc Oncol 2007;25:37-41. doi; 10.1300/J077v25n0101 /*ref*/Letelier MJ, Aller MB, Henao D, Sánchez-Pérez I, Vargas Lorenzo I, Coderch de Lassaletta J, et al. Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para medir la continuidad asistencial entre niveles desde la perspectiva del usuario: CCAENA. Gac Sanit 2010;24:339-46. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2010.03.010 /*ref*/Albada A, Ausems MGEM, van Dulmen S. Counselee participation in follow-up breast cancer genetic counselling visits and associations with achievement of the preferred role, cognitive outcomes, risk perception alignment and perceived personal control. Soc Sci Med 2014;116:178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.012 /*ref*/Juan E, Blasco T, Font A, Doval E, Sanz A, Maroto P. y Pallarés C. Percepción de control y superviviencia en pacientes con cáncer de pulmón avanzado sometidos a tratamiento paliativo. Ansiedad y Estrés 2003; 9:1-5